Intimate Partner Violence: The Perspective of Men Living in Two Municipalities in Valle del Cauca, Colombia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Introduction Intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the most common types of violence women experience. The WHO defines IPV as behavior by a current or former intimate partner causing physical, sexual or psychological harm, including physical aggression, sexual coercion, psychological abuse, and controlling behaviors.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand the perspectives of men from two municipalities in Valle del Cauca on IVP
Method: A socioecological approach was used to understand men’s perspectives. Six focus groups were conducted with male inhabitants from the cities of Cali and Tuluá, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Thirty-three men aged over 18 participated. Interviewers followed a guide with open questions based on various hypothetical scenarios involving couples.
Results:Participants recognized situations with examples of the different forms of IPV, whether psychological, social, physical, or sexual. Economic domination strategies were associated with these forms of IPV, as both a causative factor and a consequence. In the accounts of the participants, vulnerability was a pervasive factor across all levels of analysis. Participants questioned overt scenarios of violence yet failed to identify the influence of the power imbalance between sexes as underlying IPV.
Discussion and conclusion: Although there is no conscious attempt by men to reaffirm their power, men and women are conditioned by their gender in societies where the structural inequity of a patriarchal society exerts an influence at both the individual and societal level.
References
Anderson, K. L. (2010). Conflict, power, and violence in families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 726–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00727.x
Bergen, R. K., & Bukovec, P. (2006). Men and intimate partner rape: Characteristics of men who sexually abuse their partner. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(10), 1375–1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506291652
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Langage et pouvoir symbolique. Seuil.
Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. (2020). https://centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/
Chevallier, S., & Chauviré, C. (2010). Diccionario Bourdieu. Ediciones Nueva Visión.
Crego Díaz, A. (2003). Los orígenes sociales de la conciencia: Un marco teórico para la salud mental. Revista de la Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría, 88, 73–90. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0211-57352003000300006
Dunning, E. (1999). Sport Matters: Sociological Studies of Sport, Violence, and Civilization. Psychology Press.
Dunning, E., & Maguire, J. (1996). Process-sociological notes on sport, gender relations and violence control. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 31(3), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/101269029603100305
García-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. World Health Organization.
García-Moreno, C., Pallitto, C., Devries, K., Stöckl, H., Watts, C., & Abrahams, N. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization.
Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2021). Essential Concepts in Sociology. Polity Press.
Giordano, P. C., Johnson, W. L., Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Minter, M. D. (2015). Intimate partner violence in young adulthood: Narratives of persistence and desistance. Criminology, 53(3), 330–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12073
Guzmán Ordaz, R., & Jiménez Rodrigo, M. L. (2014). La interseccionalidad como instrumento analítico de interpelación en la violencia de género (Intersectionality, a methodological tool for analysing and addressing gender-based violence). Oñati Socio-legal Series, 5(2), 596–612. https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/443
Hanks, W. F. (2005). Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143907
Hardesty, J. L., & Ogolsky, B. G. (2020). A socioecological perspective on intimate partner violence research: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12652
Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses, Grupo Centro de Referencia Nacional sobre Violencia. (2018). Forensis: datos para la vida. Herramienta para la interpretación, intervención y prevención de lesiones de causa externa en Colombia. https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/documents/20143/386932/Forensis+2018.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses, Grupo Centro de Referencia Nacional sobre Violencia. (2022). Forensis 2022: datos para la vida. Herramienta para la interpretación, intervención y prevención de lesiones de causa externa en Colombia. https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/documents/20143/989825/Forensis_2022.pdf
Kabeer, N. (2014). Violence against women as ‘relational’ vulnerability: Engendering the sustainable human development agenda. United Nations Development Programme [UNDP]. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/kabeerhdr14.pdf
Kabeer, N., Huq, L., & Mahmud, S. (2013). Diverging stories of “missing women” in South Asia: Is son preference weakening in Bangladesh? Feminist Economics, 20(4), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2013.857423
Lennon, S. E., Aramburo, A. M. R., Garzón, E. M. M., Arboleda, M. A., Fandiño-Losada, A., Pacichana-Quinayaz, S. G., Muñoz, G. I. R., & Gutiérrez-Martínez, M. I. (2021). A qualitative study on factors associated with intimate partner violence in Colombia. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 26(9), 4205–4216. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021269.21092020
Moser, C. O., & McIlwaine, C. (2006). Latin American urban violence as a development concern: Towards a framework for violence reduction. World Development, 34(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.012
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Kimes, L. A. (1999). The social construction of violence: The case of sexual and domestic violence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_6
OGEN (Observatorio de Género) (2019). Informe de Violencia de Género en Valle del Cauca. https://ogen.valledelcauca.gov.co/informacion-estadistica
Pallatino, C. L., Morrison, P. K., Miller, E., Burke, J., Cluss, P. A., Fleming, R., Hawker, L., George, D., Bicehouse, T., & Chang, J. C. (2019). The role of accountability in batterers intervention programs and community response to intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 34(7), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00050-6
Pineda Duque, J., & Otero Peña, L. (2004). Gender, domestic violence and intervention in Colombia. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 17, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.7440/res17.2004.02
World Health Organization (2019). Violence against women. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
